< Back to insights hub


Commercial Disputes Weekly – Issue 2314 April 2020

Share this Page


We appreciate that our clients, partners and friends are currently facing unprecedented challenges as a result of the spread of the COVID-19 virus. Click here for a message from our Managing Partners, and here for all of our latest updates and articles on the subject. If you have any questions or require support, please do not hesitate to speak to your usual contact at WFW.

Applying the now well-known “unitary exercise” of contractual construction, the Court of Appeal has found that although there were strong linguistic grounds for accepting the claimant’s interpretation of a sub-clause when viewed in isolation, viewing the contract as a whole and in its commercial setting, in fact the defendants’ construction was to be preferred.
Teeside Gas Transportation Ltd v CATS North Sea Limited & Ors

"I have no hesitation whatsoever in rejecting [the] submission that to proceed with a remote trial in this case would be inconsistent with the guidance issued by the Prime Minister."Re One Blackfriars Limited

In a case which demonstrates the determination of the English courts to continue to operate notwithstanding the Covid-19 pandemic, the High Court has refused to adjourn the June trial of a claim against a company’s former administrators, holding that the primary and secondary legislation passed in relation to the crisis, as well as the guidance given by the judiciary, sends a clear message that hearings should continue remotely as long as that can be done safely.
Re One Blackfriars Limited

Providing a helpful reminder on the importance of clarity when serving demands for payment under guarantees, the Commercial Court has held that an email stating “we therefore hereby serve this Notice for non-payment” could constitute a demand for payment or simply be a notice of non-payment, and therefore did not constitute a formal demand.  However, a subsequent demand sent by the claimant was sufficiently clear.
Korea Shipbuilding & Offshore Engineering Co Ltd & Anr v F Whale Corporation & Anr

The Court of Appeal has emphasised the importance of waiting until the time to appeal against an order registering a foreign judgment in England and Wales has expired before taking steps to enforce, holding that issuing a Writ of Control early was unlawful and that a bankruptcy petition issued after the Writ was left unsatisfied had been rightfully dismissed.
Islandsbanki Hf & Ors v Stanford


Should you wish to discuss any of these cases in further detail, please speak with a member of our London dispute resolution team below, or your regular contact at Watson Farley & Williams:

< Back to insights hub

< Back to insights hub