Maritime Webinar Series – Episode 211 May 2021
Join Watson Farley & Williams for to the second episode of our Maritime Webinar Series on 11 May.
Join Watson Farley & Williams for to the second episode of our Maritime Webinar Series on 11 May.
In this week’s Commercial Disputes Weekly, find out what the Court of Appeal had to say about banker’s duties, without prejudice privilege and limitation periods.
Join Watson Farley & Williams and other industry leading advisors to hear them discuss trends and issues in maritime M&A including market drivers, deal structures, pricing and areas of risk and reward you should be attuned to when approaching maritime M&A transactions.
Our expert team help clients manage costs and time risks on construction and development projects and now you are invited to meet them at our live ‘On Site’ webinar event.
In our latest Commercial Disputes Weekly, find out when the legal costs principle will apply in shareholder disputes, what happens if a buyer makes an invalid nomination under an FOB contract, and whether the court will grant an adjournment if counsel withdraw from the case.
The pandemic has provided investors with a unique opportunity to forensically examine the operations of their assets whilst they are closed or limited in occupancy. How will this deeper understanding affect relationships, trading and supply?
As the maritime sector increasingly turns its attention to environmental, social and corporate governance issues, our latest article explores seafarer welfare, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, and how employers can promote the wellbeing of seafarers.
In this week’s round up find out when relief will be available for payment of an undisclosed commission, the latest on the interpretation of exclusion clauses, and what happens where a privileged document is inadvertently disclosed.
In this fifth of a series of webinars, we review key aspects concerning third party access to gas infrastructure as may be laid out in national regulatory regimes.
In this article we discuss a recent UK TCC case in which the court considered an application to strike out parts of a cladding claim on the grounds that they were insufficiently particularised.
Please wait while you are redirected to the right page...