Compensation, Mitigation and the GAFTA Default Clause
In this article, Archit Dhir and Alex McCue discuss the recent UK Supreme Court decision in Sharp Corp Ltd v Viterra BV on the measure of damages under the GAFTA default clause.
In this article, Archit Dhir and Alex McCue discuss the recent UK Supreme Court decision in Sharp Corp Ltd v Viterra BV on the measure of damages under the GAFTA default clause.
In this article, Mike Phillips and Archit Dhir discuss the recent Supreme Court decision on recovery of piracy ransom payments and its relevance to current issues in the Red Sea.
In this article we reflect on the implications of the Supreme Court decision in the Tate Modern case for the wider laws of tort and planning.
In a recent decision by The UK Supreme Court in the case of Kabab-Ji SAL (Lebanon) v Kout Food Group (Kuwait), whereby the question of which law governed the validity and scope of an arbitration agreement arose before any arbitration had taken place was considered. Take a look at the key takeaways in this article.
The long-running case was eventually decided in BCP’s favour after almost five years. The Supreme Court’s judgment has established a legally sound and commercially viable precedent for petroleum industry participants.
Find out what happens if, after a judgment or arbitral award is released, a party to the proceedings discovers the other side presented falsified documents.