Commercial Disputes Weekly – Issue 238
In this edition of Commercial Disputes Weekly, we look at issues of jurisdiction involving foreign acts of state, moratorium debts, unjust enrichment and backdoor expert evidence.
Disputes
Article
Article
Article
Article
Article
Press
Press
Article
Article
Article
Tag archive:
Commercial Disputes Weekly – Issue 237
In this edition of Commercial Disputes Weekly, we go from salvage to sovereign immunity, serious irregularity in arbitration to insurance.
ESG, Business and Human Rights: Disputes Outlook for 2025
In this article, Sarah Ellington and Lauren Satill discuss expected developments in the ESG sphere in 2025.
ESG Disputes Outlook 2024
Dispute Resolution and ESG Partner Sarah Ellington and Associate Lauren Satill consider five key trends to look out for in 2024.
Testing the Limits of The DIFC Courts’ Jurisdiction
The DIFC Court of Appeal confirms the scope of its jurisdiction for providing interim relief in support of foreign proceedings.
WFW further strengthens Asia Disputes practice with second Singapore Partner hire
Kimarie’s clients include oil majors, NOCs, SOEs, international mining companies, international trading companies and shipping companies.
WFW expands global dispute resolution and ESG practice with new partner hire
Sarah is one of very few practitioners in the UK with experience across the spectrum of ESG disputes, including crisis management and risk mitigation, with a focus on business and human rights.
Vessel underperformance disputes – how are currents and swell treated?
The significance of current and swell on performance warranties has been the subject of a number of recent LMAA arbitral awards that has brought to light certain uncertainties in this area.
No withdrawal from time charter under BIMCO Non-Payment of Hire Clause for previous unpaid hire instalments
In this article, we discuss the Commercial Court decision in The Caravos Liberty.
Growing pains in construction joint venture agreements
The English Technology and Construction Court has held that the operation of a pain/gain mechanism in an NEC3 Option C (target cost) form of contract was only to be applied once works had completed, and not on an interim basis.