SEARCH RESULTS FOR 'commercial shipping'
2111 Results
This week’s Commercial Disputes Weekly considers a Supreme Court decision on rent repayment orders, two maritime decisions as to calculation of the liability sum and determination of time limitation issues in relation to oil pollution.
This edition of Commercial Disputes Weekly considers two classic insurance issues, namely insurable interest and co-insurance, as well as the availability of an injunction to prevent enforcement of loan security and whether the resignation of an adjudicator makes a challenge out of time.
Back from our break, in this edition of Commercial Disputes Weekly we consider decisions on damages, termination, bribery, relief from forfeiture and set off.
In this edition of Commercial Disputes Weekly we consider interesting decisions on arbitration, building safety issues and contract construction.
In this edition of Commercial Disputes Weekly we consider claims by a third party directly against insurers, whether contribution liability was excluded, misrepresentation and unlawful means conspiracy.
In the last of a seven-part series on the application of US sanctions to the shipping community, this article discusses the importance of sanctions compliance.
How will the UK Government’s reform of national security for commercial transactions create new challenges for the UK? What are the implications of the proposed new regime in relation to Brexit?
Once complete, the 21-story tower, dubbed the “NYC Tech Hub,” will stand tall at the center of Manhattan’s most dynamic neighbourhood, Union Square.
This week’s delicacies offered up by the English courts include an interesting case on apparent bias, a warning from the Court of Appeal on contempt proceedings, and a useful reminder on “subject to contract” wording.
This week we cover an important decision on the limits of the court’s powers in support of arbitration, and cases which highlight the risks of pleading fraud or failing to fully comply with court orders.
We look at the latest decision in the dispute between the Tate Modern and flat owners opposite its viewing gallery, as well as decisions on the risks of bringing speculative claims, and whether a disclosed and identified principal can enforce a contract entered into by their agent.
This week we look at important decisions from the Court of Appeal on third party funding, the impact of an inadequate ship passage plan, and the knowledge requirement for the tort of inducing breach of contract.
