WFW advises MEC Energy on sale of 529 MWp solar project portfolio to EDF28 February 2023
The projects are the first solar project development pipeline acquired by EDF in Germany.
The projects are the first solar project development pipeline acquired by EDF in Germany.
The decisions in this issue of Commercial Disputes Weekly look at a variety of sources of law: a clash between statute and contract in a landlord and tenant dispute, a potential novel development of the common law with cryptocurrency, a classic battle of the forms sale of goods case and interpretation of the carve out for legal expenses from a freezing order.
Watson Farley & Williams has advised Jastar Capital on its £40m+ acquisition of Native Bankside, a luxury aparthotel in London.
In this issue of Commercial Disputes Weekly, we cover the Supreme Court’s decision that Tate Modern’s viewing gallery is a nuisance, together with judgments on apparent arbitrator bias, exercise of a finance lessee’s option to take ownership in a sanctions context and interpretation of a commonly used jurisdiction clause.
The Business Law Awards celebrate partnerships, projects and teams that promote innovation, quality and efficiency in the delivery of legal service.
The Porte Est building is located in Marseille and the Solferino building is located in Rennes.
This article reviews the key risks and challenges in Germany’s new Corporate Due Diligence Obligations for the Prevention of Human Rights Violations in Supply Chains Act for the construction sectors.
This issue of Commercial Disputes Weekly contains some valuable lessons on ensuring that you consider carefully what you are agreeing to as well as making sure finalise the contracting process. We also consider a decision on the interpretation of section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 and when a party should be allowed to defend the claim against them.
The Villa del Monte is located in the world-famous town and UNESCO World Heritage Site of San Gimignano in Tuscany, Italy.
This Commercial Disputes Weekly covers two decisions on the provision of information; one relating to misappropriated cryptocurrency and the other to business information held on employees’ personal devices. We also consider whether a call option gave sufficient proprietary interest to justify relief from forfeiture and the application of the UCTA reasonableness test with two experienced commercial parties.